NF EN ISO 4120

NF EN ISO 4120

October 2007
Standard Cancelled

Sensory analysis - Methodology - Triangle test

ISO 4120:2004 describes a procedure for determining whether a perceptible sensory difference or similarity exists between samples of two products. The method is a forced-choice procedure. The method applies whether a difference can exist in a single sensory attribute or in several attributes. The method is statistically more efficient than the duo-trio test, but has limited use with products that exhibit strong carryover and/or lingering flavours. The method is applicable even when the nature of the difference is unknown (i.e. it determines neither the size nor the direction of difference between samples, nor is there any indication of the attributes responsible for the difference). The method is applicable only if the products are fairly homogeneous. The method is effective for a) determining that either a perceptible difference results (triangle testing for difference), or a perceptible difference does not result (triangle testing for similarity) when, for example, a change is made in ingredients, processing, packaging, handling or storage; b) or for selecting, training and monitoring assessors.

View the extract
Main informations

Collections

National standards and national normative documents

Publication date

October 2007

Number of pages

22 p.

Reference

NF EN ISO 4120

ICS Codes

67.240   Sensory analysis

Classification index

V09-013

Print number

1 - 01/10/2007

International kinship

European kinship

EN ISO 4120:2007
Sumary
Sensory analysis - Methodology - Triangle test

ISO 4120:2004 describes a procedure for determining whether a perceptible sensory difference or similarity exists between samples of two products. The method is a forced-choice procedure. The method applies whether a difference can exist in a single sensory attribute or in several attributes.

The method is statistically more efficient than the duo-trio test, but has limited use with products that exhibit strong carryover and/or lingering flavours.

The method is applicable even when the nature of the difference is unknown (i.e. it determines neither the size nor the direction of difference between samples, nor is there any indication of the attributes responsible for the difference). The method is applicable only if the products are fairly homogeneous.

The method is effective for a) determining that either a perceptible difference results (triangle testing for difference), or a perceptible difference does not result (triangle testing for similarity) when, for example, a change is made in ingredients, processing, packaging, handling or storage; b) or for selecting, training and monitoring assessors.

Replaced standards (1)
NF ISO 4120
October 2004
Standard Cancelled
Sensory analisys - Methodology - Triangular test

Le présent document décrit un mode opératoire permettant de déterminer s'il existe une différence sensorielle perceptible ou une similitude entre les échantillons de deux produits. La méthode est une procédure à choix forcé. Elle s'applique s'il existe une différence pour une seule propriété sensorielle ou pour plusieurs. La méthode est statistiquement plus efficace que l'essai duo-trio, mais est d'une utilisation limitée pour les produits présentant une forte rémanance et/ou des arômes persistants.

Standard replaced by (1)
NF EN ISO 4120
March 2021
Standard Current
Sensory analysis - Methodology - Triangle test

<p>This document specifies a procedure for determining whether a perceptible sensory difference or similarity exists between samples of two products. The method is a forced-choice procedure. The method is applicable whether a difference exists in a single sensory attribute or in several attributes.</p> <p>The method is statistically more efficient than the duo-trio test (described in ISO 10399), but has limited use with products that exhibit strong carryover and/or lingering flavours.</p> <p>The method is applicable even when the nature of the difference is unknown [i.e. it determines neither the size nor the direction of difference between samples, nor is there any indication of the attribute(s) responsible for the difference]. The method is applicable only if the products are homogeneous.</p> <p>The method is effective for:</p> <p>a) determining that:</p> <ol> <li> either a perceptible difference results (triangle testing for difference);</li> <li> a perceptible difference does not result (triangle testing for similarity),</li> </ol> <p>when, for example, a change is made in ingredients, processing, packaging, handling or storage;</p> <p>b) selecting, training and monitoring assessors.</p>

Table of contents
View the extract
  • Avant-propos
    iv
  • 1 Domaine d'application
    1
  • 2 Références normatives
    1
  • 3 Termes et définitions
    2
  • 4 Principe
    2
  • 5 Conditions générales de l'essai
    3
  • 6 Sujets
    3
  • 6.1 Qualification
    3
  • 6.2 Nombre de sujets
    4
  • 7 Mode opératoire
    4
  • 8 Analyse et interprétation des résultats
    5
  • 8.1 Lors d'un essai de différence
    5
  • 8.2 Lors d'un essai de similitude
    5
  • 9 Rapport
    5
  • 10 Fidélité et erreurs systématiques
    6
  • Annexe A (normative) Tableaux
    7
  • Annexe B (informative) Exemples
    11
  • Bibliographie
    16
Need to identify, monitor and decipher standards?

COBAZ is the simple and effective solution to meet the normative needs related to your activity, in France and abroad.

Available by subscription, CObaz is THE modular solution to compose according to your needs today and tomorrow. Quickly discover CObaz!

Request your free, no-obligation live demo

I discover COBAZ