NF ISO 10399

NF ISO 10399

October 2004
Standard Cancelled

Sensory analysis - Methodology - Duo-trio test

ISO 10399:2004 describes a procedure for determining whether a perceptible sensory difference or similarity exists between samples of two products. The method is a forced-choice procedure. The method is applicable whether a difference exists in a single sensory attribute or in several attributes. The method is statistically less efficient than the triangle test but is easier to perform by the assessors. The method is applicable even when the nature of the difference is unknown (i.e. it determines neither the size nor the direction of difference between samples, nor is there any indication of the attributes responsible for the difference). The method is applicable only if the products are fairly homogeneous. The method is effective for a) determining that either a perceptible difference results (duo-trio testing for difference), or a perceptible difference does not result (duo-trio testing for similarity) when, for example, a change is made in ingredients, processing, packaging, handling or storage; or b) for selecting, training and monitoring assessors. Two forms of the method are described: the constant-reference technique, used when one product is familiar to the assessors (e.g. a sample from regular production), and the balanced-reference technique, used when one product is not more familiar than the other.

View the extract
Main informations

Collections

National standards and national normative documents

Publication date

October 2004

Number of pages

23 p.

Reference

NF ISO 10399

ICS Codes

67.240   Sensory analysis

Classification index

V09-020

Print number

1 - 24/09/2004

International kinship

Sumary
Sensory analysis - Methodology - Duo-trio test

ISO 10399:2004 describes a procedure for determining whether a perceptible sensory difference or similarity exists between samples of two products. The method is a forced-choice procedure. The method is applicable whether a difference exists in a single sensory attribute or in several attributes.

The method is statistically less efficient than the triangle test but is easier to perform by the assessors.

The method is applicable even when the nature of the difference is unknown (i.e. it determines neither the size nor the direction of difference between samples, nor is there any indication of the attributes responsible for the difference). The method is applicable only if the products are fairly homogeneous.

The method is effective for a) determining that either a perceptible difference results (duo-trio testing for difference), or a perceptible difference does not result (duo-trio testing for similarity) when, for example, a change is made in ingredients, processing, packaging, handling or storage; or b) for selecting, training and monitoring assessors.

Two forms of the method are described: the constant-reference technique, used when one product is familiar to the assessors (e.g. a sample from regular production), and the balanced-reference technique, used when one product is not more familiar than the other.

Replaced standards (1)
NF ISO 10399
May 1992
Standard Cancelled
Sensory analysis. Methodology. Duo-trio test.

Standard replaced by (1)
NF EN ISO 10399
May 2010
Standard Cancelled
Sensory analysis - Methodology - Duo-trio test

<p>ISO 10399:2004 describes a procedure for determining whether a perceptible sensory difference or similarity exists between samples of two products. The method is a forced-choice procedure. The method is applicable whether a difference exists in a single sensory attribute or in several attributes.</p> <p>The method is statistically less efficient than the triangle test but is easier to perform by the assessors.</p> <p>The method is applicable even when the nature of the difference is unknown (i.e. it determines neither the size nor the direction of difference between samples, nor is there any indication of the attributes responsible for the difference). The method is applicable only if the products are fairly homogeneous.</p> <p>The method is effective for a) determining that either a perceptible difference results (duo-trio testing for difference), or a perceptible difference does not result (duo-trio testing for similarity) when, for example, a change is made in ingredients, processing, packaging, handling or storage; or b) for selecting, training and monitoring assessors.</p> <p>Two forms of the method are described: the constant-reference technique, used when one product is familiar to the assessors (e.g. a sample from regular production), and the balanced-reference technique, used when one product is not more familiar than the other.</p>

Table of contents
View the extract
  • Avant-propos
    iv
  • 1 Domaine d'application
    1
  • 2 Références normatives
    1
  • 3 Termes et définitions
    2
  • 4 Principe
    2
  • 5 Conditions générales d'essai et exigences
    3
  • 6 Sujets
    3
  • 6.1 Qualification
    3
  • 6.2 Nombre de sujets
    4
  • 7 Mode opératoire
    4
  • 8 Analyse et interprétation des résultats
    5
  • 8.1 Lors d'un essai de différence
    5
  • 8.2 Lors d'un essai de similitude
    5
  • 9 Rapport
    6
  • 10 Fidélité et erreurs systématiques
    6
  • Annexe A (normative) Tableaux
    7
  • Annexe B (informative) Exemples
    12
  • Bibliographie
    19
Need to identify, monitor and decipher standards?

COBAZ is the simple and effective solution to meet the normative needs related to your activity, in France and abroad.

Available by subscription, CObaz is THE modular solution to compose according to your needs today and tomorrow. Quickly discover CObaz!

Request your free, no-obligation live demo

I discover COBAZ