IEC 62464-1:2018
IEC 62464-1:2018

IEC 62464-1:2018

December 2018
International standard Current

Magnetic resonance equipment for medical imaging - Part 1: Determination of essential image quality parameters

IEC 62464-1:2018 specifies measurement procedures for the determination of many essential image quality parameters for MR EQUIPMENT. Measurement procedures as addressed in this document are suitable for– quality assessment in the ACCEPTANCE TEST, and– quality assurance in the CONSTANCY TEST.Required levels of performance for ACCEPTANCE TESTS are not provided for all tests.This document does not address– image quality assessment of MR EQUIPMENT with a static magnetic field intensity greater than 8 Tesla, if not otherwise stated,– image quality affected by MR-compatibility issues,– special diagnostic procedures such as flow imaging, perfusion, diffusion, radiotherapy and image-guided therapy applications, and– TYPE TESTS.The scope of this document is also limited to measuring image quality characteristics in images acquired on TEST DEVICES, not in PATIENT images.The measurement procedures specified in this document are directed to– MANUFACTURERS, who can demonstrate compliance by performing ACCEPTANCE and CONSTANCY TESTS as described by this document,– test houses, who can confirm performance of MR EQUIPMENT using methods described in this document,– regulatory authorities, who can reference this document, and– RESPONSIBLE ORGANISATIONS who want to perform ACCEPTANCE and CONSTANCY TESTS using methods described in this document.The essential image quality parameters and measurement methodologies defined in this document are– SIGNAL TO NOISE RATIO,– UNIFORMITY,– SLICE THICKNESS in 2-D scanning,– 2-D GEOMETRIC DISTORTION,– SPATIAL RESOLUTION, and– GHOSTING ARTEFACTS.Each of these procedures can be performed standalone or in combination with any of the other procedures.This document describes the preferred measurement procedures. It also describes alternative normative methods in Annex A. The preferred test methods may be substituted with these alternative normative methods. If necessary, other methods not described in this document can be used, provided those other test methods are documented and validated against the methods described in the document: it means an analysis is done by comparison to the original method that demonstrates a similar, or better, level of sensitivity to the same parameter of interest and a similar, or better, level of robustness against unrelated parameters. All methods will produce quantitative results.The rationale to the preferred and alternate methods, and their pitfalls, are described in Annex B.This document also presents requirements for CONSTANCY TESTS suitable for MR EQUIPMENT quality assurance programs concerning essential image quality parameters. There are no preferred CONSTANCY TEST methods, to provide flexibility in using existing automated procedures where available, but suggested examples of test methods can be found in Annex A. This document places an emphasis on consistently repeatable, automated measuring tools that facilitate trend analysis and the frequent quick testing of a small set of important parameters that are sensitive to the overall operating characteristics of the MR EQUIPMENT.IEC 62464-1:2018 cancels and replaces the first edition published in 2007. This edition constitutes a technical revision.This edition includes the following significant technical changes with respect to the previous edition:a) the tests have been revised to comply with the technical progress;b) the range of B0 was increased from 4 T to 8 T.

Main informations

Collections

International IEC standards

Publication date

December 2018

Number of pages

178 p.

Reference

IEC 62464-1:2018

ICS Codes

11.040.50   Radiographic equipment
Sumary
Magnetic resonance equipment for medical imaging - Part 1: Determination of essential image quality parameters

IEC 62464-1:2018 specifies measurement procedures for the determination of many essential image quality parameters for MR EQUIPMENT. Measurement procedures as addressed in this document are suitable for
– quality assessment in the ACCEPTANCE TEST, and
– quality assurance in the CONSTANCY TEST.
Required levels of performance for ACCEPTANCE TESTS are not provided for all tests.
This document does not address
– image quality assessment of MR EQUIPMENT with a static magnetic field intensity greater than 8 Tesla, if not otherwise stated,
– image quality affected by MR-compatibility issues,
– special diagnostic procedures such as flow imaging, perfusion, diffusion, radiotherapy and image-guided therapy applications, and
– TYPE TESTS.
The scope of this document is also limited to measuring image quality characteristics in images acquired on TEST DEVICES, not in PATIENT images.
The measurement procedures specified in this document are directed to
– MANUFACTURERS, who can demonstrate compliance by performing ACCEPTANCE and CONSTANCY TESTS as described by this document,
– test houses, who can confirm performance of MR EQUIPMENT using methods described in this document,
– regulatory authorities, who can reference this document, and
– RESPONSIBLE ORGANISATIONS who want to perform ACCEPTANCE and CONSTANCY TESTS using methods described in this document.
The essential image quality parameters and measurement methodologies defined in this document are
– SIGNAL TO NOISE RATIO,
– UNIFORMITY,
– SLICE THICKNESS in 2-D scanning,
– 2-D GEOMETRIC DISTORTION,
– SPATIAL RESOLUTION, and
– GHOSTING ARTEFACTS.
Each of these procedures can be performed standalone or in combination with any of the other procedures.
This document describes the preferred measurement procedures. It also describes alternative normative methods in Annex A. The preferred test methods may be substituted with these alternative normative methods. If necessary, other methods not described in this document can be used, provided those other test methods are documented and validated against the methods described in the document: it means an analysis is done by comparison to the original method that demonstrates a similar, or better, level of sensitivity to the same parameter of interest and a similar, or better, level of robustness against unrelated parameters. All methods will produce quantitative results.
The rationale to the preferred and alternate methods, and their pitfalls, are described in Annex B.
This document also presents requirements for CONSTANCY TESTS suitable for MR EQUIPMENT quality assurance programs concerning essential image quality parameters. There are no preferred CONSTANCY TEST methods, to provide flexibility in using existing automated procedures where available, but suggested examples of test methods can be found in Annex A. This document places an emphasis on consistently repeatable, automated measuring tools that facilitate trend analysis and the frequent quick testing of a small set of important parameters that are sensitive to the overall operating characteristics of the MR EQUIPMENT.
IEC 62464-1:2018 cancels and replaces the first edition published in 2007. This edition constitutes a technical revision.
This edition includes the following significant technical changes with respect to the previous edition:
a) the tests have been revised to comply with the technical progress;
b) the range of B0 was increased from 4 T to 8 T.
Replaced standards (1)
IEC 62464-1:2007
IEC 62464-1:2007
January 2007
International standard Cancelled
Magnetic resonance equipment for medical imaging - Part 1: Determination of essential image quality parameters

This international standard specifies measurement procedures for the determination of many essential medical MR equipment image quality parameters. Measurement procedures as addressed in this standard are suitable for: - quality assessment in the acceptance test; - quality assurance in the constancy test. In addition, the measurement procedures specified in this standard may also be useful for type tests, although that is not an objective of this standard. The scope of this standard is also limited to measuring image quality characteristics in test devices, not in patient images. The measurement procedures specified in this standard are directed to: a) manufacturers, who can demonstrate compliance by performing acceptance and constancy methods as described by this standard, b) test houses, which can confirm performance of mr equipment using methods described in this standard, c) regulatory authorities, who can reference this standard, and d) responsible organisations who want to perform acceptance and constancy tests using methods described in this standard. The essential image quality parameters and measurement methodologies defined in this standard are: - signal-to-noise ratio, - uniformity, - slice thickness and slice profile, - geometric distortion, - spatial resolution, and - ghosting. This standard describes the preferred measurement procedures. It also describes alternative methods in Annex A. The preferred test methods may be substituted with the alternative methods. If necessary, other methods not described in this standard may be used, provided these other test methods are documented and validated against the methods described in the standard. Validation of other test methods requires an analysis of test sensitivity to the same parameter of interest and an analysis of the insensitivity of the test to other unrelated parameters and should demonstrate a similar, or better, level of sensitivity to the same parameter of interest and a similar, or better, level of robustness against unrelated parameters. All methods shall produce quantitative results. This standard also presents requirements for constancy tests suitable for MR equipment quality assurance programs concerning essential image quality parameters. There are no preferred constancy test methods, to provide flexibility in using existing automated procedures where available, but suggested examples of test methods are found in Annex A. If necessary, other constancy test methods not described in this standard may be used. Since the needs of responsible organisations' quality assurance programs may vary, responsible organisations are encouraged to determine the necessary scope of tests, quality of the tests, and the sensitivity of the data analysis etc. This standard places an emphasis on consistently repeatable, automated measuring tools that facilitate trend analysis and the frequent quick testing of a small set of important parameters which are sensitive to the overall operating characteristics of the mr equipment.

Need to identify, monitor and decipher standards?